Skip to main content

What experts say II

David Gauntlett is an important figure amongst media theorists, known for his Identity Theory. He studied how media affected one’s identity in relation to gender, femininity, masculinity, sexuality etc, arguing that all of them are in continuous process of transformation (vom Orde, 2016).

Q&A with Professor David Gauntlett | Bayes Business School

Suggesting that one’s identity is built through observation of role models that one is exposed to, he argued that media provide growing population with a variety of such models, which might encourage people to behave or look similarly to them. Gauntlett used the example of Lara Croft to explain how the film character might have an influence over the young generation, communicating to girls to become stronger and more independent through Lara Croft’s confident and cool portrayal (vom Orde, 2016). 

 

This might be a useful theory to explain such phenomenon as the increasing number of clean-eating bloggers who liked the idea of being healthy and beautiful and started creating similar content, while getting eating disorders. Some examples of these can be owners of best-selling clean-eating books, who realised the extent of the harm with time. 

 

References

 

Vom Orde, H. (2016). Perspectives on identity: An overview of identity concepts from psychoanalysis, sociology, and psychology. Televizionhttps://www.br-online.de/jugend/izi/english/publication/televizion/29_2016_E/vom_Orde-Perspectives_on_identity.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My view

Lack of plurality in media representation leads to the concept of otherness, which divides people into “us” and “them” and is typically used to refer to all groups of people outside of mainstream representations that tend to communicate the norm (Zevallos, 2011). Occasionally, media creators have been criticised for producing singular representations and excluding some groups of people for profit purposes, namely minorities, because it creates an unbalanced reality. Although, social movements and increasing attention to equality issues have pressured media industries, it is still a common problem of repeating conventions and promoting stereotypes to reduce the risk on financial side.   Television is one of the most powerful media, however it is not publicly revealed that majority of TV channels are owned by a small number of conglomerates that seek to be vertically and horizontally integrated to gain as much profit as possible. Given that businesses’ main objective is to maximise f...

Current events I

Racism. Always has been and still remains one of the most present problems in media from Brooklyn 9-9 to Emily In Paris. Release of the latter, in fact, became a standing event.   Emily In Paris, is a show released on Netflix about an American woman who moves to Paris for work. From the first sight it doesn’t convey negative associations, however, after a few episodes the theme of ignorance and racism is brought to front. Emily herself, people who she encounters and the city of Paris, representations of all enforce clichés and American perspective as supreme to other cultures. Almost every single episode promotes extreme intolerance and arrogance.   Surprisingly, it starts with representation of Paris itself. Emily’s life in Paris covers exclusively common stereotypes about France, meaning “cheating, croissants and couture” (De Oliveira & Smith, 2022), while omitting important cultural characteristics that make Paris look Paris. Some of the most disturbing issues in the sh...

Profit-driven stereotyping in media

I think many can agree that we all more or less have been seeing same images in media for a long time. And that is for a reason.    As soon as media industry realised that people like seeing familiar things, it started to exploit this idea heavily. An ideology or some pattern of thinking were basically sold to people and then used when creating media products to attract them as customers. It may seem as simple supply and demand thing, but it actually can be really dangerous to society, because it sets norms and beliefs that may not be realistic at all, and yet it sells, because it looks beautiful or it’s funny, but more importantly it’s habitual.    I thought of reason modern society doesn’t really change its approach to representing gender, race, nationalities or just a new concept that would be more tolerant if present ones are obviously disturbing and definitely not realistic. And the answer would be because it is a high risk to introduce something new into the ma...